Is it just love?

In response to a picture in one of the posts I found in Cedric's greenified blog , I couldn't resist but add itsy bitsy things here and there. Do people actually enjoy getting tickled and wrestled with? This reminds me of one couple I know who wrestle like 24/7, its like free WWE show. Anyway, if a guy starts flinging rocks at my window, I can't imagine the cracks I'll see on the glass and next, I wonder if I survive a volcanic erruption from my mum the next morning over cracked window panes. Isn't it kind of weird to get somebody mad on purpose and then doing whatsover after that?? It's the same concept like purposely getting someone very happy and then slapping them. Isn't it weird to slow dance without music?? Or is it 'nature's music' such as the birds chirping and the frogs croaking?? Okay, kissing in the rain, another of those typical romance tales but what if the girl gets sick the next day from being in the rain eh??

SHAVED CAT!

Tadaaaaaaaa!!! For the sake of amusement and with 'permited' authority from Stefan Kho, I stole this from his Friendster profile. Not like I even need Stefan's permission right... Anyway! Look!!! It's a shaved cat!!! Seriously...WHAT SORT OF CAT IS THAT??!

Shaved cat...

Shaved cat...

Shaved cat...

OKAY! Enough!!! Time out.

...maybe I should ask Jas to shave his dog(s)...

Is that a panda or a dog?? How do we tell pandas appart from dogs now?? What's next?? Giraffe dogs??

SMK. St. Joseph's team & rants

Look who's featured on my blog today! SMK. St. Joseph 's debaters! From left to right

they are, Jason Wong, Doron Teh, Bruce Wong, Perry Tan, Jonas Gumis and Chun Hoe. And hey! Look at can see my team right behind them! See the girl with the ponytail directly behind Bruce?? That's me! St. Joseph just had to have a background with St. Teresa's team right behind them as memory. Hahaha!

That's Jonas, the first speaker speaking, Jason the second speaker and Doron the third speaker. They were opposition for the fast food topic.

Anyway, I was so pissed today. Okay, sure we lost the debate but there is no need to rub it in by saying vulgar things like, "I told you guys would lose against Batu Lintang. How can you guys lose??" or things like, "You guys are lousy that's why lose" or "I heard St. Jo's team was lousy and Doron was lousy." or "how are you feeling?" or "aren't you sad that you lost?" or "does mean you lose everything?" I mean, what the heck... If you were not there, don't say a word because you don't know what happened. So keep your thoughts to yourself. What is this? Moral support ah?? If you are not a debater, you don't have the rights to judge another debater. And even if you are a debater, you don't have the rights to voice out your opinions about the other debater. All debaters are good in their own aspects. We have agressive or sarcastic or mild or firm speakers, we have an assortment. But frankly, you are not a debater, you don't even have to right to call other schools lousy or other debaters lousy. Do you even personally know Doron? Have you personally heard Doron speak? If no, then have no say, have no comments on St. Joseph's team or St. Teresa's team or any other team. Why am I even bothering, it's not like St. Joseph's my team or what right? But I personally think it still doesn't give you the right to criticize any team when you were not there to witness anything. So zip it. End of the story.

Rules and regulations if you are not a debater

1. You have no rights to judge another debater.

2. If you don't want to give moral support, feel like junking, zip it.

3. Don't ask a team that lost, how do they feel. You know how they feel. Happy ah?

4. Don't make sweeping statements about teams/speakers being lousy.

Rules and regulations if you are a debater

1. You know the team was not an easy team, so don't bullshit trying to be cocky and say that they were actually lousy.

2. You don't have the rights to judge another debater as well.

Quote of the day:

Lee Chun Hoe(s) are like underwear, what they reveal are misleading but what they hide are interesting.

Debate & McD

It was the Interschool Debate today at Kolej Abdillah. My team consists of Kristen as 1st speaker, Azureen as 2nd speaker, I as the 3rd speaker and Rhema and Nishanti as reserves. We got a by for the first round with some topic regarding co-curriculum and we drew lots and got opposition for our 2nd round, with the motion, "Fast food advertisements should be banned." We went against Batu Lintang and unfortunately, we lost. I have further comments, however not in specific detail about this particular debate later at the end of my post. Now, let's move on to some stuff that occured this morning... Anyway, in that picture in the left, that's just me attempting to look high and mighty and failing miserably. Anyway, today, the school actually had McDonald's delivered to our school just for us! And they are compensating RM5 for each of us! Nisha got her wish of wanting chocolate because there was chocolate topped sundae. How ironic, we are debating on fast food yet we are eating it. Oh, we savored our UNHEALTHY meal in the library.

me, the 3rd speaker trying to put on another high & mighty look & failing miserably...

Kristen Chew & Azureen Bakrie, 1st & 2nd speakers...what are they doing again??

Nishanti Ranee & Rhema Basil (somewhere lurking in the photo...), reserved speakers

Leftovers from our McD meal...

More remainders...

Kristen...busy missing McD's

Nisha being too absorbed in drinking...

Rhe & I in the process of eating...

Nisha throwing away our rubbish...

It was one very interesting debate indeed... very, very, very "INTERESTING". To what I see, it was sort of like we were both argueing on different things, not on one thing instead. I have LOTS to comment about this debate, like one million and one comments. However, I chose to not express it publicly. So far, only those who had spoken to me about the debate know about it such as some octopus, some gorilla, some doggie and some human bean. It was just VERY VERY "INTERESTING".

Winky & Lassie

Winky & Lassie
so so so adorable!!!

Lassie
How could anyone resist such a cutie!

Lassie
her again...too cute not to potray

Winky
she's a black Shih Tzu and adorable!

Winky
just too adorable...

Good day dear Mr/Mrs/Miss Anonymous!

To the Mr or Mrs or Miss Anonymous,

Perhaps getting confused by the commotion and the sudden standback against your stands of my show-offness? Suddenly from pinpointing your finger on the show-offness in me that you see to Joanna's statement about you being a chicken? Is it just confusion or is it that you just have a tendency to see everything from the negative side?

May I question you, you state that Joanna was a chicken as well because there are many Joanna's' in the world. So, for example, if her name was Joanna Tan, there are many Joanna Tan's' in the world. And if she puts her full name, Joanna Tan Ming Xin, for example, there are many Joanna Tan Ming Xin's' in the world. So, do you demand for her to put down in extreme micro-detail such as her name, her age, her sex, her identification card number, her address and deep down the the very depths of her personal details to deferentiate her from another Joanna?? And if so, aren't you supposed to do the same either? I can see that you are indeed, contradicting yourself. Is it confusion again, I ponder??

Indeed it may appear rude to you the way I phrase my sentences about that particular teacher but, isn't it better to come clean than to beat around the bush just to phrase it in another way the exact thing I am trying to imply? Do we have to beat around the bush when everything can end with a full stop with a simple displacement of going right to the point? Is it just confusion again that you are facing or is this just how your personality is to beat around the bush and preach your personality to me to beat around the bush like you as well to come off as "nice" about that particular teacher whereas my mind does not even speak the slightest bit so?? Is that what you are trying to imply here??

You don't see how this had turned into an arguement? For me it is not an arguement, it is simply a confliction of your opinion against my opinion. I daresay not to quote it as an arguement so fret not about it being an arguement or are you confused once more on my intentions and posts about your intentions?? Perhaps it has to be clarified. Blogging ethics are ethics in deed, nobody stated or ruled that they are rules and indeed if you can see, this is a blog unless you are confused once more whether this is a blog or not?? Oh dear, facing alot of confusion aren't we here?? Nevermind, you can be helped to surface from the midst of your tangles of confusions. Indeed you are criticising and I was only replying to your critism and clarifying to you that what it was, was simply my joy over my victory. Of course, you have to be excused as you are very confused indeed. I have a question to ponder, I wonder why are you so worked up over what we are worked up when you said you don't see what is there to get so worked up over this topic. Hmmmm...confused once more, Anonymous?

A very Happy Easter to you and God bless. (if you are Christian, oh well)

I DON'T BLOG TO PLEASE

First of all, I don't blog to please people. I blog for my own self-amusement and treat it like a great big "book" on my life that is indexed for me to refer to next time. The whole point of a blog is to serve as a place for you to spew out whatever that is on your mind and not to please the readers. If everyone were to blog to please the readers, it wouldn't be a blog about his or her life or daily thoughts but it would be like a tabloid blog, it pleases the readers just because it's what they like to see and read and savor. You can call my post about me winning the best speaker thing, when I said, "guess who's the best speaker? Me, me, me and me!" as being proud or arrogant or stuck up but hey, this is my blog and the duty of my blog is to serve as a piece of my life, so I blog and phrase as I like. Whether you voice out your point of view or not, that's your personal problem. As far as it concerns me, I blog to how it suites me and not to please any readers.

If I were to blog to please the readers, with constant piority to their point of view, others' point of views, I might as well shut down my blog and not blog because the whole main idea of a blog is for my daily gibberish and not gibberish that pleases readers. You can comment whatever you want but nothing will change my perspective of blogging to please and amuse myself and not the ordinary man. For those who have no idea what I am rambling about, refer to the chatbox.

PS: I don't blog to please and amuse the ordinary man.

Gabrielle supports child labour...

My debate team...Rhe, Nisha and I. (Fel's not in the picture)

As cruel as it seems, debate is all about pushing aside your personal opinions and supporting whatever you are told to support. Pretty ironic eh? I had another round of debate today against the government team, Farrah, Melissa and Michelle. The motion of the day was, "This House bans child labor" and I must say that this was a pretty lopsided topic that had more pros than cons but nevertheless my team pulled it off!!! Or either we were just lucky or perhaps it was skill? *rubs hands gleefully and cackles* Once again, I got best speaker and the brilliant part comes when I will be representing SMK. St. Teresa for interschool debate this end of April in Kolej Abdillah. Shame I won't be getting any or the least teensiest weensiest bit of help from a rather helpful octopus that debates, I'm sure he knows who he is. *coughs out loud!*

First of all, I supposed that my team won today because the government wasn't really prepared and was rater confused with the motion of the day. Even Puan Sandy seemed confused with the motion of the day. But frankly speaking, it was a rather unbalanced topic as child labor varies in different countries across the world and the motion never defined it as global child labor or child labor within a particular country. This was one pretty confusing topic based on several basis but nevertheless, it did make sense although it didn't make sense. Oh what the heck, I am so not making sense now but really! It did not make any sense but somehow, sense came through or was it pure babbling??

I'm going to be facing a busy, busy month ahead of me... Anyway, did I mention yet? I was chosen as Senior Council for the mooting team. The two senior councils are Azureen and me, junior council Kristen and Zahira. Solicitors are Demie and Lilian. Oh, as for the interschool debate thingy, the speakers are Azureen, Kristen and me. The reserves are Rhema and Nishanti. All right, that's all the babbling and boasting I got to do today. Now, allow me to flee from the screen...

I got best speaker twice and therefore as I conclude, Jason Chen has to 'chia' me!!! This closes the deal!

Lame-dancing

I went to Jalan Song the other day to grab some supper and I ran into my first ever live breakdancing demonstration (?) there! I guess it wasn't really a demonstration as it was just a group of breakdancer-wannabes who brought the mat and a boombox. It was pretty lame to be frank, if it was a real breakdancer, I would have abondoned my Cantonese noodles and videotaped the whole breakdance. But, this was like just wannabes leaping up and down like toads from one corner to the other corner of the mat... Furthermore, the beat was pretty slow. Breakdancing used to be cool but now, after witnessing this... I got no further comments.